However, not everybody agrees with this! (Which, however, has had no impact on the rule so far, so you MUST observe it ;-))) For example, there is one person, Sylvia Chalker, who argues against the "right grammar rule." Here is a link to one page of a review article where this person gives good reasons for why one might need to rethink a "correct grammar rule."
One of your peers will summarize Mrs. Chalker's arguments for you, and post the summary here on the blog as a new thread. All of you (even the person who posted the summary!) then have to post a short comment with their personal opinion about whether Mrs. Chalker was right or wrong.
Chalker does make a point about instances where who is definitely a plural subject, but did anyone else feel her examples sounded awkward? Our in-class lessons used the singular replacement pronouns he and him. While the subjects and objects were not always a single person, the accompanying verb tense always reflected a singular entity. Those sentences just sounded more correct than Chalker's examples. Her point has merit, but this is one time where I have to side with style over substance.
ReplyDelete